Defense Opinion Article: CHIPS and Ships: Time to Stop Gambling with U.S. Seapower
Semiconductor Surge Versus Shipyard Struggle
The United States is at a strategic crossroads, grappling with the challenge of maintaining its global technological and military dominance. Key to this struggle are two critical sectors: semiconductor manufacturing and naval shipyards. While China advances rapidly, planning to open 18 new semiconductor fabrication plants in 2024 alone, the U.S. is also attempting to bolster its capabilities in this area with significant federal investments. However, the comparison grows stark when it comes to naval capabilities. Last year, China launched 30 navy combat ships, starkly overshadowing the U.S. production of just two, highlighting a concerning trend in naval preparedness that could threaten U.S. maritime superiority.
Biden's Billions for Chips, But What About Ships?
The U.S. administration has acknowledged the strategic importance of semiconductors, channeling billions into the sector through initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, which earmarked $19.5 billion to expand semiconductor facilities such as Intel’s Arizona campus. This demonstrates a robust commitment to retaining technological edge. However, there's a glaring discrepancy in the attention given to the naval shipbuilding sector, which has seen budget cuts and delays. New acquisitions like aircraft carriers and submarines are postponed, while projects like the Constellation-class frigates fall years behind schedule.
The Declining State of the U.S. Navy
An aging fleet and insufficient new ship deliveries further compound the U.S. Navy's operational challenges. According to recent reports from the Congressional Budget Office, the number of operational ships in the U.S. Navy, currently at 290, is expected to decline over the next decade before eventually increasing. This decline comes at a critical time when maritime tensions, particularly in the South China Sea, are rising, making the need for a strong naval presence more urgent than ever.
The Economic and Community Impact of Shipyards
The decline of the shipbuilding industry has broader implications beyond national security. The closure of shipyards like Avondale in Louisiana not only marks a reduction in military readiness but also impacts local economies and communities that have historically relied on these facilities for employment and economic activity. Shipyards have been a lifeline for many communities, offering stable, well-paying jobs and fostering local development. The loss of such institutions translates into a significant socio-economic shift for the affected regions.
Strategic Recommendations for U.S. Naval Revival
Urgent Need for Investment
Drawing parallels with the semiconductor industry, where aggressive funding has spurred growth and innovation, the naval shipbuilding sector requires a similar infusion of capital. It will take billions in federal funding to modernize facilities, support innovation, and restore the competitiveness of U.S. shipyards.
Boosting Ship Production
To reclaim maritime superiority, the U.S. should match and exceed China’s naval expansion. This would involve setting ambitious targets to increase the naval fleet, including manned and unmanned vessels, over the next decade. Such a move would demonstrate a firm commitment to maintaining a global naval presence and deterring potential threats.
Maximizing Domestic Shipbuilding Capabilities
Before outsourcing capabilities overseas, the U.S. must utilize its existing domestic resources. This strategy involves activating underutilized shipyards nationwide and ensuring they are fully equipped and staffed to handle increased production demands. Expanding the industrial base will not only bolster military readiness but also stimulate local economies.
Prioritizing the Workforce
Investing in the shipbuilding workforce is essential for the longevity of the industry. This means not only hiring but also training workers to ensure they have the skills needed for today's advanced shipbuilding requirements. Long-term contracts and stable funding will provide the job security needed to attract and retain skilled labor.
A Call to Balance and Action
The contrasting state of investment and attention between America's semiconductor and naval shipbuilding sectors highlights a significant imbalance. While strides are made in one area, others suffer, potentially compromising national security in a critical domain. This requires a balanced approach to strategic investments to ensure that the U.S. remains a global leader in both technological and military arenas.
How should the U.S. balance its strategic investments to ensure it remains competitive on all fronts? What policies would best support the revitalization of the U.S. naval shipbuilding industry?
Comments